Debate despre CSR in presa economica internationala
Contra
Investor’s Business Daily publica un articol critic la adresa CSR, preluat de CNNMoney.com:
For Business, ‘Socially Responsible’ Should Mean Earning A Big Profit
2 din concluziile acide ale articolului:
“By spending the company’s funds on activities that he decides arbitrarily are “socially responsible,” a corporate executive, in effect, reduces returns to shareholders — and is, therefore, spending someone else’s money.”
“Neither free enterprise nor the human condition is likely to experience net benefit from companies pursuing “corporate social responsibility.” Such actions do, however, raise the cost of doing business and lower corporate productivity. By diverting resources away from productive capital, businessmen will hurt many of the very people they claim to want to help.”
Articolul e scris bine, insa critica nu se bazeaza pe altceva decat pe argumente teoretice, rezultate din gandirea lui Milton Friedman sau pe aluzii la adresa performantei lui Annan la UN.
PRO
Pe de alta parte, o divizie de cercetare a The Economist, Economist Intelligence Unit, publica rezultatele unei cercetari la nivel global, care demonstreaza ca performanta financiara a unei companii este corelata cu performanta de CSR:
Studiul arata ca investitia in CSR nu este o bariera pentru performanta financiara. Mai mult, arata ca in opinia celor peste 300 de CEO intervievati, performanta in domeniul CSR este esentiala pentru succesul per ansamblu al companiei.
Spre exemplu:
“[..] companies in the survey that saw their share price rise by at least 50% in the last three years (share price climbers) place a greater importance on social and environmental goals than companies with share prices that have declined by more than 10% (share price losers).”
“Most executives (57%) say that the benefits of pursuing sustainable practices outweigh the costs, although eight out of 10 expect any boost to profits to be small.”

[...] aduce argumente pro si contra [...]
Cel mai mult ma enerveaza la articole de tipul celui scris de Investors’ Business Daily faptul ca scot lucrurile din context… Extrag fragmente de date si le coreleaza intr-un mod total idiotic. Ce are de-a face revolutia verde (care a avut rezultate excelente) cu scandalul petrol-contra-hrana in care a fost implicat Annan? Ceva de o calitate asemanatoare fusese anuntat zilele trecute pe news ca “superarticol” ce denunta indoctrinarea socialista predata in scolile vestice: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4095 Oricum, frumoasa alaturare a celor doua articole
Multe din articolele “radicale” de stanga folosesc rationamente la fel de solide. Asta nu e un articol de stanga, insa…